Clean compilation -Wextra

Before this commit jemalloc produced many warnings when compiled with -Wextra
with both Clang and GCC. This commit fixes the issues raised by these warnings
or suppresses them if they were spurious at least for the Clang and GCC
versions covered by CI.

This commit:

* adds `JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC` macros: `JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC_{PUSH,POP}` are
  used to modify the stack of enabled diagnostics. The
  `JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_...` macros are used to ignore a concrete
  diagnostic.

* adds `JEMALLOC_FALLTHROUGH` macro to explicitly state that falling
  through `case` labels in a `switch` statement is intended

* Removes all UNUSED annotations on function parameters. The warning
  -Wunused-parameter is now disabled globally in
  `jemalloc_internal_macros.h` for all translation units that include
  that header. It is never re-enabled since that header cannot be
  included by users.

* locally suppresses some -Wextra diagnostics:

  * `-Wmissing-field-initializer` is buggy in older Clang and GCC versions,
    where it does not understanding that, in C, `= {0}` is a common C idiom
    to initialize a struct to zero

  * `-Wtype-bounds` is suppressed in a particular situation where a generic
    macro, used in multiple different places, compares an unsigned integer for
    smaller than zero, which is always true.

  * `-Walloc-larger-than-size=` diagnostics warn when an allocation function is
    called with a size that is too large (out-of-range). These are suppressed in
    the parts of the tests where `jemalloc` explicitly does this to test that the
    allocation functions fail properly.

* adds a new CI build bot that runs the log unit test on CI.

Closes #1196 .

test/integration/mallocx.c

@@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ purge(void) {
 	    "Unexpected mallctl error");
 }
 
+/*
+ * GCC "-Walloc-size-larger-than" warning detects when one of the memory
+ * allocation functions is called with a size larger than the maximum size that
+ * they support. Here we want to explicitly test that the allocation functions
+ * do indeed fail properly when this is the case, which triggers the warning.
+ * Therefore we disable the warning for these tests.
+ */
+JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC_PUSH
+JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ALLOC_SIZE_LARGER_THAN
+
 TEST_BEGIN(test_overflow) {
 	size_t largemax;
 
@@ -145,6 +155,9 @@ TEST_BEGIN(test_oom) {
 }
 TEST_END
 
+/* Re-enable the "-Walloc-size-larger-than=" warning */
+JEMALLOC_DIAGNOSTIC_POP
+
 TEST_BEGIN(test_basic) {
 #define MAXSZ (((size_t)1) << 23)
 	size_t sz;