Update mallocx() OOM test to deal with smaller hugemax.
Depending on virtual memory resource limits, it is necessary to attempt allocating three maximally sized objects to trigger OOM rather than just two, since the maximum supported size is slightly less than half the total virtual memory address space. This fixes a test failure that was introduced by 0c516a00c4cb28cff55ce0995f756b5aae074c9e (Make *allocx() size class overflow behavior defined.). This resolves #379.
This commit is contained in:
parent
21e33ed317
commit
44d12d435a
@ -70,22 +70,27 @@ TEST_END
|
||||
TEST_BEGIN(test_oom)
|
||||
{
|
||||
size_t hugemax, size, alignment;
|
||||
|
||||
hugemax = get_huge_size(get_nhuge()-1);
|
||||
bool oom;
|
||||
void *ptrs[3];
|
||||
unsigned i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It should be impossible to allocate two objects that each consume
|
||||
* more than half the virtual address space.
|
||||
* It should be impossible to allocate three objects that each consume
|
||||
* nearly half the virtual address space.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
void *p;
|
||||
|
||||
p = mallocx(hugemax, 0);
|
||||
if (p != NULL) {
|
||||
assert_ptr_null(mallocx(hugemax, 0),
|
||||
"Expected OOM for mallocx(size=%#zx, 0)", hugemax);
|
||||
dallocx(p, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
hugemax = get_huge_size(get_nhuge()-1);
|
||||
oom = false;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(ptrs) / sizeof(void *); i++) {
|
||||
ptrs[i] = mallocx(hugemax, 0);
|
||||
if (ptrs[i] == NULL)
|
||||
oom = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_true(oom,
|
||||
"Expected OOM during series of calls to mallocx(size=%zu, 0)",
|
||||
hugemax);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(ptrs) / sizeof(void *); i++) {
|
||||
if (ptrs[i] != NULL)
|
||||
dallocx(ptrs[i], 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if LG_SIZEOF_PTR == 3
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user