Subvert tail call optimization in backtrace test.

Re-structure alloc_[01](), which are mutually tail-recursive functions,
to do (unnecessary) work post-recursion so that the compiler cannot
perform tail call optimization, thus preserving intentionally unique
call paths in captured backtraces.
This commit is contained in:
Jason Evans 2014-01-21 14:59:40 -08:00
parent e2206edebc
commit 898960247a

View File

@ -28,18 +28,24 @@ static void *alloc_##n(unsigned bits);
static void * \
alloc_##n(unsigned bits) \
{ \
void *p; \
\
if (bits == 0) { \
void *p = mallocx(1, 0); \
assert_ptr_not_null(p, "Unexpected mallocx() failure"); \
return (p); \
} \
\
if (bits == 0) \
p = mallocx(1, 0); \
else { \
switch (bits & 0x1U) { \
case 0: return (alloc_0(bits >> 1)); \
case 1: return (alloc_1(bits >> 1)); \
case 0: \
p = alloc_0(bits >> 1); \
break; \
case 1: \
p = alloc_1(bits >> 1); \
break; \
default: not_reached(); \
} \
} \
/* Intentionally sabotage tail call optimization. */ \
assert_ptr_not_null(p, "Unexpected mallocx() failure"); \
return (p); \
}
alloc_n_proto(0)
alloc_n_proto(1)
@ -74,7 +80,7 @@ thd_start(void *varg)
i+1 == NALLOCS_PER_THREAD) {
bt_count = prof_bt_count();
assert_zu_le(bt_count_prev+(i-i_prev), bt_count,
"Expected larger bactrace count increase");
"Expected larger backtrace count increase");
i_prev = i;
bt_count_prev = bt_count;
}