By force-inlining everything that would otherwise be a macro, we get the same
effect (it's not clear in the first place that this is actually a good idea, but
it avoids making any changes to the existing performance profile).
This makes the code more maintainable (in anticipation of subsequent changes),
as well as making performance profiles and debug info more readable (we get
"real" line numbers, instead of making everything point to the macro definition
of all associated functions).
Instead of passing down the new_addr, pass down the active edata which allows us
to always use a neighbor-acquiring semantic. In other words, this tells us both
the original edata and neighbor address. With this change, only neighbors of a
"known" edata can be acquired, i.e. acquiring an edata based on an arbitrary
address isn't possible anymore.
This avoids the addr-based mutexes (i.e. the mutex_pool), and instead relies on
the metadata tracked in rtree leaf: the head state and extent_state. Before
trying to access the neighbor edata (e.g. for coalescing), the states will be
verified first -- only neighbor edatas from the same arena and with the same
state will be accessed.
Using an edata_t both for hugepages and the allocations within those hugepages
was convenient at first, but has outlived its usefulness. Representing
hugepages explicitly, with their own data structure, will make future
development easier.
This introduces a new sort of edata_t; a pageslab, and a set to manage them.
This is part of a series of a commits to implement a hugepage allocator; the
pageset will be per-arena, and track small page allocations requests within a
larger extent allocated from a centralized hugepage allocator.
