Fix or suppress the remaining warnings generated by static analysis.
This is a necessary step before we can incorporate static analysis into
CI. Where possible, I've preferred to modify the code itself instead of
just disabling the warning with a magic comment, so that if we decide to
use different static analysis tools in the future we will be covered
against them raising similar warnings.
Static analysis flagged this. It's possible to segfault in the
`*_tree_remove` function generated by `rb_gen`, as `nodep` may
still be `NULL` after the initial for loop. I can confirm from reviewing
the fleetwide coredump data that this was in fact being hit in
production, primarily through `tctx_tree_remove`, and much more rarely
through `gctx_tree_remove`.
ex_destroy iterates over the tree using post-order traversal so nodes
can be removed and processed by the callback function without paying the
cost to rebalance the tree. The destruction process cannot be stopped
once started.
